Risk Reduction Formulas:
| From: | To: |
Risk reduction measures the effectiveness of an intervention in preventing adverse events. Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) shows the actual difference in event rates between control and experimental groups, while Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) expresses this difference as a percentage of the control event rate.
The calculator uses the following formulas:
Where:
Explanation: ARR represents the actual clinical benefit, while RRR shows the proportional reduction and is often used in statistical reporting.
Details: Understanding both ARR and RRR is crucial for clinical decision-making. ARR helps determine the number needed to treat (NNT), while RRR provides a measure of treatment effect size that's independent of baseline risk.
Tips: Enter both CER and EER as proportions between 0 and 1. For example, 15% should be entered as 0.15. Ensure EER is less than or equal to CER for meaningful results.
Q1: What's the difference between ARR and RRR?
A: ARR shows the absolute difference in event rates, while RRR shows the proportional reduction. RRR often appears larger and can be misleading without context.
Q2: How do I convert ARR to Number Needed to Treat (NNT)?
A: NNT = 1 / ARR (when ARR is expressed as a decimal). For example, ARR of 0.1 gives NNT of 10.
Q3: When is RRR more useful than ARR?
A: RRR is useful for comparing treatment effects across different populations with varying baseline risks, as it's independent of the control event rate.
Q4: Can ARR be negative?
A: Yes, if the experimental treatment increases risk compared to control, ARR will be negative, indicating harm rather than benefit.
Q5: How should I interpret these results clinically?
A: Consider both ARR and RRR together with confidence intervals, p-values, and clinical relevance. A large RRR may not be clinically important if the baseline risk is very low.